What is the significance of these papers? Well the papers state the child of the couple as Burack Hussein Obama II born August 4, 1961. Read the full story here,
Dunham v. Obama
Just for those who may not be up to speed on the citizenship issue. BHO Sr was a Kenyan citizen at the time and Kenya was under British rule. So there is no transfer of citizenship from BHO Sr. Stanley Ann Dunham-Obama was 18 years old. The laws in effect at the time stated that a child to be a natural born citizen the mother would have had to be a US citizen and lived in US territory for (10) years and at least (5) of those years after the age of (14) to register Obama as a "natural born" citizen, she was only 18. Section 301(a)(7) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of June 27, 1952, 66 Stat. 163, 235, 8 U.S.C. §1401(b), Matter of S-F-and G-, 2 I & N Dec. 182 (B.I.A.) approved (Att’y Gen. 1944). Obama could only have become a U.S. citizen if naturalized, and a naturalized citizen is not qualified and/or eligible to run for the office of President of the United States. U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section I.So it really does not matter where he was born. Further more it is my contention that PEBO is in fact an illegal alien, he is an Indonesian citizen. Just incredible.
EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS (ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO ARE LAWYERS) SHOULD KNOW THIS:
ReplyDeleteWhen counting the electoral votes, EITHER Congress finds by 1/8/09 that Obama -- not being an Article II “natural born citizen” since his dad was Kenyan/British citizen at BHO's birth -- fails to qualify as President whereupon Biden becomes the full fledged President under 3 USC 19 (free to pick his own VP such as Hillary) OR Congress must/will defer to the Supreme Court to enjoin Obama’s inauguration with Biden becoming only Acting President under the 20th Amendment until a new President is duly determined.