Saturday, June 27, 2009

Open Letter to My Representatives

New Hampshire Delegation of Congress

United States Senators State of New Hampshire

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I’m going to attempt to grab your attention as quickly as I can. I say that because I could write hundreds of pages and offer volumes of evidence pertaining to this subject. I will try to be succinct and offer only minimal evidence.

This is not only about the usurper in the White House but all of you that have refused to perform your duties as described and have willfully ignored your oaths of office. I would imagine that at one time you all revered public service as grandiose, or you would not have entered public service. So somewhere inside of you rest the ideals that were the foundation of your endeavor. I appeal to those ideals because I know that every red blooded American holds those same ideals near and dear to their hearts, just to get us all on the same page.

Without this sounding like a threat I do need to warn you that Grand Juries are forming in increasing numbers and they are not just investigating Barry Soetoro AKA Barack Obama but everyone complicit in his rise to office of President. For instance Nancy Pelosi personally signed an affidavit claiming she had verified Barry Soetoro AKA Barack Obama’s eligibility documents. However she has ignored repeated request to release these said documents, as has everyone else involved. No one on this planet has seen documents that support the requirements, of Barry Soetoro AKA Barack Obama, under Article II section I of our constitution requiring that the President be a “natural born citizen” or that person or persons would have offered them by now. What that means is that all of you that have sworn to uphold the constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic are complicit in this matter. Do you understand where this is heading?

I would also point out that this letter is not in response to any political event or other act of government and can be documented that this issue has been brought to the attention of people in government, that normally oversee these matters, for over a year. Well before the election in November of last year and has continued to be brought to the attention of everyone in congress. So much so that there was a “Form Letter Response” to this issue that staff from every congressional and senate office sent out in reply. Shame on all of you!

The 1st amendment grants We The People the right to “redress of grievance”. We The People have filed many of these grievances in this matter. You have chosen to ignore them. For such action we have the right to withhold all due taxes until such grievances are settled.

We The People have the right to form grand juries for the purpose of government oversight. We are currently exercising that right.

As stated in the opening I could write hundreds of pages and offer volumes of evidence. I think that you have seen, read, and heard of the evidence. What you are faced with now are two choices. You can stop the madness now and begin the process of undoing all that the usurper has signed and is invalid, or you wait for We The People to arrive with subpoenas, warrants, court orders, and alike and be faced with even more to undo. That choice is yours, We The People have made ours.

Article II Section I of the constitution requires that the president be a “natural born citizen” described as a child born of “parents who are citizens”. Note that both the words parent and citizen are plural. In other words “Both parents need to be citizens at the time of birth.” Barry Soetoro AKA Barack Obama admits himself that his father was a British subject, therefore by decent his son was a British subject in accordance with British Nationality Act of 1948. We can also examine his mother’s citizenship and conclude that she was too young to confer citizenship at the time, not that that matters.


Greg Goss


Manchester Union Leader

Nashua Telegraph

Conway Sun

Fosters Daily Democrat

Laconia Citizen

Washington Times

Washington Post

Wall Street Journal

Related post;

The Usurper Gets Fireworks for 4th of July

Every Law Obama Signs Brings Us Closer....

The Birth Certificate Issue and Why It Matters


  1. Would you be kind enough to show us where, in the Constitution, it is said that a persons parents must be citizens of the US in order for their child to be a natural born citizen?

    Go ahead, I'll wait.

    No? Oh, that's right. The Constitution of the United States does not say that.

  2. Actually, Article II Section 1 of the Constitution says nothing about the president's parents; in fact, the word "parents" occurs nowhere in the Constitution. Article II Section 1 does say that president must be a "natural born" citizen, in contrast to Senators and Representatives, who only need to have been citizens for nine and seven years respectively. Exactly what makes a citizen was not defined until 1868 in the 14th Amendment, which gives citizenship to "all persons born or naturalized in the United States." Again, no mention of parents.

    People will be more likely to take you seriously if you take the time to get your facts straight.

  3. Thank you for your comments. I did not state that the constitution stated what a "natural born Citizen" is. I stated what a NBC is described as.

    I could reference many pieces but this is a good start.

    Please educate yourself in our most precious document and how it came to be.

    Feel free to visit often and comment. The free exchange of ideas is what makes this country great.


  4. So Greg,
    In view of your concern for the validity of your duly elected leader, were you equally concerned for the validity of the unelected but appointed leader from the 2000 election?
    Does your duly elected leader appear to be trashing the Constitution as much as the previous unelected leader did? (The Constitution? That document? It's only a piece of paper! GWB)

  5. Greg,

    You wrote: Article II Section I of the constitution requires that the president be a “natural born citizen” described as a child born of “parents who are citizens”.

    That is, other commenters have pointed out, an utterly erroneous statement. The Constitution does not mention, in any way, shape or fashion, anything whatsoever about the parents of the president (or anyone else, for that matter). There is nothing in the laws of the US that requires anything about the parentage of candidates.

    The text of Article II is as follows:

    No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

    Not a word there about parents. It is a fairly simply and straightforward fact.

  6. Some pretty wild assumptions on your part Mr. or Ms. Anonymous.

    I did not have a blog in 2000 and I am not happy with the trashing of the Constitution through any period of history and will continue to fight for our republic long after the "duly elected" leader is gone.

    Our elections process includes the verifying of the electoral college vote by Congress. They failed to duly qualify the candidate, another violation of our Constitution, and I have called them on that as well.

    At what point do you speak out for the trashing of that piece of paper?

  7. Steve, you are correct and as I stated above there is a source for what is described as a natural born citizen. In my effort to keep my letter short and on point I did not elaborate as to the source. The link I provided in my comment above is a good place to start.

    I could have been more careful with my wording but it is like describing the 2nd amendment as saying it states we have the "right to bare arms" like my Glock 45mm, and you could say "Greg it doesn't say that".

    Thank you for commenting and feel free to return.

  8. Sure, we've all got the right to “redress of grievance”. We just can't call every asinine thing that pops into our heads "grievances".